Critical Listening Paper Essay

Social psychologist Amy Cuddy presents a formal demonstrative computer address on proboscis langu eon. The general spirit of the spoken communication was to inform. Cuddys attire was formal. She was app atomic number 18led in dispirited high gear heels, black stockings, a black skirt, a long thin black cover-up, and jewelrya heavy necklace and hoop earrings. The vocalisers knowledgeableness unimpeachably captured my attention. She started her speech by stating that she would offer a muster out no-tech career hack additional to a request that she made to the hearing this definitely draws the audience into what she is about to say. The speaker engages with her audience by asking them to make a certain act, while also enticing them with a free life-hack. It sure did enhance the speakers credibleness because she is offering almost motley of valuable advice to her audience. The audience is generally older in age (late 20s & up), on that point is a mix of males and females , and there seems to be a good diversity in races.Most are dressed semi-formally if not formally. The speaker definitely adapts her remarks to the audience by catering to the characteristics of their demographics ex. Relating her subject field to job interviews. The speaker establishes rapport with her audience through constant nub contact, communicative conversational tone, fluency, hand/arm gestures, and personal stories. Cuddys speech was about organic structure terminology and how we see ourselves. The speakers thesis argument was the following Fake it until you become it. The main blockages for this speech are the following our non-verbals govern how we think and feel about ourselves (Power-posing), our bodies change our minds (Testosterone/ hydrocortisone take aims), and our bodies change our behavior and our behavior changes our outcomes. The speaker uses the topical organizational kind to deliver her speech. It is definitely appropriate for the topic and speaking si tuation.Her organization makes it easier for the audience to logi chitchaty interpret and understand the important points that she is trying to make. Additionally, the speaker uses phrase to improve the effectiveness of her speech. She is very conversational which exerts the audience to be much alert, responsive, and empathetic to her. The speakers speaking voice is not matted and she definitely uses effective vocabulary in her speech as puff upnot too difficult, but not too plain.Additionally, the Cuddy uses the right hail of vocal expressions. Amy Cuddy mainly used images to support her real(a). Her short clip and images worked exceedingly well in accompaniment her main points/argument. Besides the effective images on her slide depict, the speakers use of her personal experiences and stories definitely supported her points. She establishes her credibility by telling a story that ultimately establishes her educational level Cuddy is a professor at Harvard University.Cuddy concludes her speech by reiterating her thesis statement and reinforcing the speechs general and specific purpose. She ends her speech with a call to action. The conclusion that she makes calls the audience to 1.) try power-posing and 2.) to share the science. The speaker provides closure to show the audience that her speech was finished with her call to action and thanking the audience. The speakers use of non-verbal elements of delivery was outstanding. Her arm and hand gestures were appropriate, she maintained meaningful midpoint contact/engagement throughout her entire speech, and her overall body language to her audience was one that really entices the audience to pay attention and be engaged. The speaker used presentation aids, and in my opinion, they were extremely effective and engaging.Moreover, it is go past to see that the speakers presentation aids were adequate supporting material through the audiences responses ex. Laughter, applause. In my opinion, the strongest pa rt of the speech was the speakers story about her personal experience. This was part of the body of her speech and it was her supporting evidence for one of her main points. She used emotion to appeal to her audience about her tragic accident and her journey to recuperation and faking it until you become it. This was the strongest part of the speech because it is memorable and got a strong reaction out of the audience. Not only that, but it was great supporting material for the speakers thesis. On the other hand, there werent whatsoever weaknesses to Cuddys speech necessarily.If I had to choose one weak point however, it would be the intonation from the body to the conclusion. This was the weakest part of the speech because it was difficult to concretely establish the concluding paragraph of the speech. I could not tell whether the finale was part of the speechs body and the conclusion was that extremely short, or whether the conclusion of the speech was very long. A better tr ansition into the conclusion would make the speech better. The setting of this speech wasextremely formal. The coat of the room was fairly largeit appeared like a theatre. Cuddy is atop a large stage and the spotlight is on her. The room is darker where the audience is. This kind of setting impacts the speech in a way that makes the speaker the join of attention. The audience gives supportive feedback to the speaker.They laugh at all the right times, and the Cuddy responds to this feedback by really engaging with the audience through her questions and affirmations in a non-overdoing way. At the end of her speech, the members of the audience stand up from their seats while broad her a big applause. On a scale of 1-10, I would pace this speaker a 10. This is because this speaker encompassed every characteristic that an effective speaker should portray. She obviously knows what she is doing and has had sufficient practice and experience. I would definitely enjoy perceive to Cuddy a gain because not only was her topic very interesting and pleasurable to listen to and learn about, but she was a great speaker in general.I especially liked the way that she catered her speech to her audience. In my opinion, there werent issues that the speaker should have addressed but did not. The speech was stocky and effective. The conclusion of the speech, however, was either too long or too short. I could not tell whether the ending was part of the body and the conclusion was just extremely short, or whether the conclusion was just very long.Works CitedCuddy, A. (2012, October). Your body language shapes who you are. Retrieved July 30, 2014, from TED http//www.ted.com/playlists/171/the_20_most_popular_talks_of_a