DOUBLE SPEAK Essay -- essays research papers

DoublespeakDoublespeak, whether intentional or unintentional is communication that is obscure, pompous, vague, evasive and confusing.() In most casefuls, doublespeak tries to achieve a particular objective as is the case in President bushs voice communication to the province on September 11, after the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. The objective of this linguistic process is clearly to mollify the emotions of a frightened nation and at the akin time watch the intuitive feeling for what is to come as a contribute of the attacks. In this quarrel one eject find many examples of doublespeak. These examples appear to be intentional although they defy typical doublespeak in that the doublespeak is not mean for any personal gains and is not concealed with a lot of gnarled language. If one can understand some of the basic principles about reservation sense of media-speak then the domino effect of this type of diction can be reduced.One of the first statements Pr esident Bush makes in his speech can be classified as doublespeak. When he says Our way of liveliness, our very freedom came under attack, he is indirectly aspect that everything the Statesns are accustomed to and enjoy is at stake. With these simple words and the tone chosen to deliver them President Bush is strategically taking the emotions of the American people for a ride while making it clear that the American people are his target listening. An important principle for properly deciphering this instance of doublespeak is to unload first chemical reactions and get them out in the open so the rest of the message can be received clearly and unimpeded by inner thoughts. Other examples of doublespeak that fit into the same category as the previous one are when President Bush uses the phrases, Foundation of America and Steel of American Resolve. Both of these examples attempt to evoke an emotional response although, the emotions attempting to be extracted are different from thos e in the beginning of the speech. They differ because they set the tone for new offensive and secure feelings opposed to the original feelings of excuse and endangerment. This example also illustrates how obscure doublespeak can be.President Bush regards the attacks as despicable and evil acts. The word evil is the doublespeak in this example. The way he uses this word automati... ...nbspG-d is stronger than any human on earth.Walk through the vale of the shadow of death, I fear no evilNot fearing the terrorists because of such(prenominal) a tragedy in close proximity.Every walk of lifeAll races, genders, and cultures.Resolve for justice and peaceWe are going to war.Eliminating Mediaspeak Is it substantiate Now?Doublespeak is deceptive as are most of the examples mentioned from this speech. On the contrary, doublespeak as explored through this example is sometimes a necessary tool to address an issue in a manner that is politically correct. When the doublespeak present in this sp eech is eliminated the underlying themes are not entirely lost and the speech is still effective. I think given the circumstances the audience was glad with the underlying messages delivered and probably expected them making it easier to decipher President Bushs jargon. The speech could have been delivered without doublespeak and more directly, but the perception of the audience would likely remain the same.